If you want Twitter to have better epistemics, we need to have more forgiving blocking practices10/28/2024 If you want Twitter to have better epistemics, we need to have more forgiving blocking practices Trigger-happy blocking leads to echo chambers. Yes, even blocking people who seem to have “bad epistemics”. Because remember two facts:
This is a fundamental practice of good epistemics. What seems like “bad epistemics” might actually be correct. Or you might have misunderstood what the person was saying. This happens all. The. Time. Don’t block yourself from updating.
How are people going to come to better conclusions if all the people with said good conclusions won’t let them even see the better conclusions?
Whenever I hear about somebody being blocked for something that seems small, I become more scared to post online. What if that happens to me? Lots of other people are thinking this too. This leads to less intellectual exploration and sharing, leading to an intellectual scene that is decidedly suboptimal. Of course, sometimes blocking is the correct thing to do. I’m not saying to never block people. Just be cautious with blocking. Only resort to blocking after:
But if they were just aggressive towards me, I’ll follow the steps above. Because I want to be the change I want to see in the world. I want to practice blocking practices that prevent echo chambers and promote civil disagreement. Polarization requires people to participate for it to work. And you can decide to not participate. Read more: All
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Popular postsThe Parable of the Boy Who Cried 5% Chance of Wolf
The most important lesson I learned after ten years in EA Why fun writing can save lives Full List Categories
All
Kat WoodsI'm an effective altruist who co-founded Nonlinear, Charity Entrepreneurship, and Charity Science Health Archives
February 2025
Categories
All
|